> Yes, since the 70's Bork and the Chicago school has held sway in courts Oh OK, so then I am correct under the overwhelming majority position/framework which

> Yes, since the 70's Bork and the Chicago school has held sway in courts Oh OK, so then I am correct under the overwhelming majority position/framework which is the only interpretation that matters for enforcement, which is the interpretation held by the court system. I am more than happy to accept that concession and only be "wrong" under the minority position that hasn't been relevant for 40 years. > That's not the policy of Lina Khan and the current FTC They can make whatever bad arguments they want in court, and lose their lawsuits I guess. They don't decide the outcome of these court cases. If anything this strategy is actually harming then, as they make failing arguments that the courts won't listen to.