3 ms·
I said vomit and I meant vomit. I have an opinion about this, and I intended to convey that opinion. I'm not trying to avoid the appearance of bias.
by VyseofArcadia 3y ago
I said vomit and I meant vomit. I have an opinion about this, and I intended to convey that opinion. I'm not trying to avoid the appearance of bias.
- verdverm 3y agoummm, where did you say "vomit" before this most recent comment? You've only contributed the top-level comment in this branch of the thread
- VyseofArcadia 3y ago> AI generated code vomit needs to be called something else. From the top level comment.
- verdverm 3y agoOff-by-one error for me, my bad My reply about vomit applies to you then too, showing bias always weakens your argument
- johnnyworker 3y ago"2 + 2 equals four" "If you add one fucking two to another two, you get the disgusting but still correct result of four" It may weaken your ability to follow the argument, but not the argument itself. It does not weaken mine so maybe you're holding it wrong.
- verdverm 3y agoI think you have something backwards in your logic gates, you do not get to decide if your argument is weak or strong I am now sure you're holding it wrong, you're trying to make an analogy that does not work. In the first case, an opinion is made about the quality of LLM output. Here, you are stating a mathematical fact two ways. There is nothing to debate about 2+2 being 4