>I can say that 1+1=2 means it’s lunchtime on the moon You're still confusing the symbols with the meaning. >Just the fact that I can disagree with you right

>I can say that 1+1=2 means it’s lunchtime on the moon You're still confusing the symbols with the meaning. >Just the fact that I can disagree with you right now means there isn’t an objective truth. If there was, then we wouldn’t even be able to disagree Please explain how objective truth existing would prevent people from disagreeing with each other. >And the universe is not based on any axiomatic anything, maybe your models of the universe are, but those models are just a subjective approximation to whatever the reality of the universe is Yes, that's more or less what I said. However, those models contain objectively true statements with regards to themselves. According to the theory of relativity no object can go faster than light, correct? A sandwich is an object, correct? Then it's objectively true that according to the theory of relativity a sandwich can't go faster than light. It doesn't matter whether sandwiches actually are capable of going faster than light, that the theory of relativity states (indirectly) that sandwiches can't go faster than light is an objective truth.