I've read quite a bit of Chmosky's commentary, that how I knew to reference the old article from his own site. It's perfectly valid to criticize US foreign pol

I've read quite a bit of Chmosky's commentary, that how I knew to reference the old article from his own site. It's perfectly valid to criticize US foreign policy and double so as a citizen. But Chomsky is jut full of shit and a liar. In Invasion Newspeak[1] he claims there was never any American Danchev with respect to Vietnam. Early coverage was actually critical[2], and after the Tet offensive it really went south. Chomsky just totally ignores this, it's inconvenient to his narrative. Moreover, you don't need to call refugees liars to criticize the US. You don't need to "well actually" what happened in Bosnia. Chomsky is a liar and piece of shit. [1]https://chomsky.info/198912__/ https://chomsky.info/198912__/ [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20091211102035/https://www.museum.tv/eotvsection.php?entrycode=vietnamonte https://web.archive.org/web/20091211102035/https://www.museu...