2 ms·
Its just an excuse to avoid admitting that it was a failure. In the next paragraph it says: > The company made the decision that building up ARES would take “s
by jeremyjh 3y ago
Its just an excuse to avoid admitting that it was a failure. In the next paragraph it says:
> The company made the decision that building up ARES would take “significant” investment and it couldn’t continue to fund those efforts.
Well, which is it? Is it so trivial that anyone can compete, or is it too costly to build it?
- hn_throwaway_99 3y ago> Well, which is it? Is it so trivial that anyone can compete, or is it too costly to build it? I think that's the wrong "either/or" framing in this case. It's not that building competing tech would be trivially cheap, but it's something around which Snap would not likely have a moat or any sort of competitive advantage. It's also in a business area that's pretty unrelated to their core offering.
- jeremyjh 3y agoAnd they didn't know these things six months ago? No. They tried something, and it failed, and they don't want to say that.
- hn_throwaway_99 3y ago> They tried something, and it failed, and they don't want to say that. The CEO's exact quote was "Leading in augmented reality means that sometimes we will fail, and I am proud that our team dared to build this business even if we did not succeed." So I'm not sure why you think "they don't want to say that." > And they didn't know these things six months ago? Given that the initiative was originally announced in March, I'm assuming the whole project was greenlit at least 3-6 months prior to that. And ChatGPT was only just released on Nov 30, 2022, and since then it hardly feels like a week goes by where I'm not mindblown by some new AI announcement. So yeah, I think it's entirely reasonable to think that the landscape when this ARES project was first started is very different than the one we find ourselves in today.