Climate neutral fuel only makes sense for uses, like airplanes, where batteries won't work. For one thing, synthesized fuels will be expensive. For anything tha

Climate neutral fuel only makes sense for uses, like airplanes, where batteries won't work. For one thing, synthesized fuels will be expensive. For anything that can switch to batteries, it will be much cheaper to use electricity. Expensive enough that will have to force people to switch and not use fossil fuels. Nobody will use synthesized fuels for their car unless it is some special classic or sports care. Hydrogen or ammonia will likely be cheaper to make than hydrocarbons and might work for many uses, like airplanes and ships, that can't use batteries. Hydrocarbons may be only be used for places where can't upgrade. Synthesized fuels aren't fossil fuels. If you want name, say hydrocarbon fuel.