3 ms·
Until hiring decisions are subjective and prone to manipulation - the "rainmakers" will not be fired. Middle management is screwed, though. Though functions li
by JAlexoid 3y ago
Until hiring decisions are subjective and prone to manipulation - the "rainmakers" will not be fired. Middle management is screwed, though.
Though functions like CEO and a lot of the executive suite - are under threat of just being replaced.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> functions like CEO and a lot of the executive suite - are under threat of just being replaced By what? A Board-hired AI?
- JAlexoid 3y agoHalf of your marketing can already be replaced with AI, and CMO's strategy is better generated by ChatGPT. Quite a few people on the marketing team should be shaking... Quite a few CEOs should just sit on the board and stick to reviewing an AI generated strategy implementation plan. Because it's still the board that decides on the strategy, while CEO typically is focused on the implementation of said strategy. CEO as a fulltime position is definitely under threat here.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> marketing can already be replaced with AI, and CMO's strategy is better generated by ChatGPT Agree. > Quite a few CEOs should just sit on the board and stick to reviewing an AI generated strategy implementation plan Generating strategy is an important part of a CEO’s job. But it’s far from the main one. Their job is, centrally, about people. Managing relationships external and internal. That is AGI-territory work.
- JAlexoid 3y agoDisagree about CEO. A hired CEO, not director/owner/founder, is not a strategy creator.
- alanfranz 3y agoOtoh middle management often provides the human layer, something chatgpt can’t do. What would you replace manager 1:1 with? Planning? Coaching? Frustration venting? Team building?