3 ms·

I wonder if such tennant can be evicted.

by toyg 3y ago

jacquesm 3y ago
If it's found they felled the tree then they're in a lot of trouble.
- AlecSchueler 3y ago
  Sadly it would be pretty hard to pin this on them. Farmers and field owners get away with almost anything in the UK. Look at the gorse fires or the state of Lough Neagh.
  - jacquesm 3y ago
    I believe you but I find it hard to imagine that something like this would go without serious consequences. Here in NL cutting down any tree, even if it is on your own land requires a permit. Doing it without a permit to a vandalize a valuable piece of heritage should not be without consequences.
    - yourusername 3y ago
      > Here in NL cutting down any tree, even if it is on your own land requires a permit. Depends on the municipality. Rules around cutting down trees vary from "go ahead if it's not one of these 5 protected trees" to "please pay 1000 euro to request a permit 6 weeks in advance".
      - jacquesm 3y ago
        Go ahead is still a permit though.
        yourusername 3y ago
        Many municipalities state there is no need for a permit unless you want to cut down specific protected trees.
    - bombcar 3y ago
      The problem is proving it; everyone in rural areas know of things that occur "outside the law" and exactly who did it, but there's no court-admissible evidence.
      - notahacker 3y ago
        Court admissible evidence is more likely to turn up when it's front page news and people are digging though. Same with the recent story about a famous pub called the Crooked House, which mysteriously caught fire a month after a new owner took over the closed premises and was demolished remarkably swiftly. Because it generated a lot of outrage (not from regular patrons, but from people who liked how it looked), it got more attention than your average arson where the owners were obvious suspects, and sure enough there have been actual arrests as well as rumours about other fires involving the same owners and evidence of demolition equipment having been leased the day before the fire
        AlecSchueler 3y ago
        Rumours and arrests are one thing and not uncommon in any case, but has anyone been charged with a crime?
        notahacker 3y ago
        Rumours about organizations behind the incident are normally in local pubs rather than national newspapers though. The last couple of arrests were only today, with three more released on bail. Proving it in a courtroom is another thing, but it sounds to me like more resource than would usually be thrown at investigating a fire in an empty building.
        AlecSchueler 3y ago
        Rumours in the pub and rumours in the paper are no different in the court of law. Has any evidence been brought forward and has anyone been charged with a crime?
    - AlecSchueler 3y ago
      You've misunderstood me. Cutting down this tree in the UK also needs permission. The question is only whether the landowner in question can or would be tied to the crime and punished. This is also an issue in the NL. I grew up in the UK but I've lived the most significant years of my life in the NL so I feel like I can speak a bit to both cases. If something happens in the countryside with noone around to see there's very little that can be done, there's a certain impunity or a security through obscurity that exists outside of cities. And I know that this is HN and what I'm about to say doesn't quite meet general etiquette rules here, but the idea that farmers are somehow more controlled in the NL than elsewhere is laughable when the literal Farmers Party is one of the main political forces in the country.
      - jacquesm 3y ago
        > And I know that this is HN and what I'm about to say doesn't quite meet general etiquette rules here, but the idea that farmers are somehow more controlled in the NL than elsewhere is laughable when the literal Farmers Party is one of the main political forces in the country. No disagreement on that one, we're out of control to put it mildly. The next elections (which are soon) will be 'interesting' for all the wrong reasons.
  - benj111 3y ago
    That's because the police generally don't give a toss, and neither do the courts. If it gets in the newspapers etc, then it's suddenly in their interests to do something. DNA samples will be getting taken as we speak.
- madaxe_again 3y ago
  Not really. As the police say they are investigating whether a crime has been committed, because quite likely, there has not been. This is more likely a private matter between tenant and landlord - and unless the lease explicitly prohibits the felling of trees, then they haven’t broken their lease agreement. If it wasn’t the tenant, then at most it’s vandalism, property damage, and a small fine will be the result.
  - mnw21cam 3y ago
    Criminal damage is definitely classified as a crime, hence the name, even if the punishment is (as you say) likely just a small fine.

I wonder if such tennant can be evicted.

by toyg 3y ago

I wonder if such tennant can be evicted.

jacquesm 3y ago

If it's found they felled the tree then they're in a lot of trouble.

AlecSchueler 3y ago
Sadly it would be pretty hard to pin this on them. Farmers and field owners get away with almost anything in the UK. Look at the gorse fires or the state of Lough Neagh.
- jacquesm 3y ago
  I believe you but I find it hard to imagine that something like this would go without serious consequences. Here in NL cutting down any tree, even if it is on your own land requires a permit. Doing it without a permit to a vandalize a valuable piece of heritage should not be without consequences.
  - yourusername 3y ago
    > Here in NL cutting down any tree, even if it is on your own land requires a permit. Depends on the municipality. Rules around cutting down trees vary from "go ahead if it's not one of these 5 protected trees" to "please pay 1000 euro to request a permit 6 weeks in advance".
    - jacquesm 3y ago
      Go ahead is still a permit though.
      - yourusername 3y ago
        Many municipalities state there is no need for a permit unless you want to cut down specific protected trees.
  - bombcar 3y ago
    The problem is proving it; everyone in rural areas know of things that occur "outside the law" and exactly who did it, but there's no court-admissible evidence.
    - notahacker 3y ago
      Court admissible evidence is more likely to turn up when it's front page news and people are digging though. Same with the recent story about a famous pub called the Crooked House, which mysteriously caught fire a month after a new owner took over the closed premises and was demolished remarkably swiftly. Because it generated a lot of outrage (not from regular patrons, but from people who liked how it looked), it got more attention than your average arson where the owners were obvious suspects, and sure enough there have been actual arrests as well as rumours about other fires involving the same owners and evidence of demolition equipment having been leased the day before the fire
      - AlecSchueler 3y ago
        Rumours and arrests are one thing and not uncommon in any case, but has anyone been charged with a crime?
        notahacker 3y ago
        Rumours about organizations behind the incident are normally in local pubs rather than national newspapers though. The last couple of arrests were only today, with three more released on bail. Proving it in a courtroom is another thing, but it sounds to me like more resource than would usually be thrown at investigating a fire in an empty building.
        AlecSchueler 3y ago
        Rumours in the pub and rumours in the paper are no different in the court of law. Has any evidence been brought forward and has anyone been charged with a crime?
  - AlecSchueler 3y ago
    You've misunderstood me. Cutting down this tree in the UK also needs permission. The question is only whether the landowner in question can or would be tied to the crime and punished. This is also an issue in the NL. I grew up in the UK but I've lived the most significant years of my life in the NL so I feel like I can speak a bit to both cases. If something happens in the countryside with noone around to see there's very little that can be done, there's a certain impunity or a security through obscurity that exists outside of cities. And I know that this is HN and what I'm about to say doesn't quite meet general etiquette rules here, but the idea that farmers are somehow more controlled in the NL than elsewhere is laughable when the literal Farmers Party is one of the main political forces in the country.
    - jacquesm 3y ago
      > And I know that this is HN and what I'm about to say doesn't quite meet general etiquette rules here, but the idea that farmers are somehow more controlled in the NL than elsewhere is laughable when the literal Farmers Party is one of the main political forces in the country. No disagreement on that one, we're out of control to put it mildly. The next elections (which are soon) will be 'interesting' for all the wrong reasons.
- benj111 3y ago
  That's because the police generally don't give a toss, and neither do the courts. If it gets in the newspapers etc, then it's suddenly in their interests to do something. DNA samples will be getting taken as we speak.
madaxe_again 3y ago
Not really. As the police say they are investigating whether a crime has been committed, because quite likely, there has not been. This is more likely a private matter between tenant and landlord - and unless the lease explicitly prohibits the felling of trees, then they haven’t broken their lease agreement. If it wasn’t the tenant, then at most it’s vandalism, property damage, and a small fine will be the result.
- mnw21cam 3y ago
  Criminal damage is definitely classified as a crime, hence the name, even if the punishment is (as you say) likely just a small fine.