3 ms·
> But very few actually want to put on the enormous amount of work needed to improve YAML or create a new language. No need to create a new language: S-express
by eadmund 3y ago
> But very few actually want to put on the enormous amount of work needed to improve YAML or create a new language.
No need to create a new language: S-expressions have existed for longer than I’ve been alive.
> IMO if there was something that was substantially better, we would see projects switching to it in a heartbeat.
I disagree. Path-dependence is a real issue, as are local maxima.
> the effort to make any kind of switch so you can shorten Norway
It’s not so that one can shorten Norway; it’s to avoid silent errors (like the Excel-gene issue). Fortunately, this particular bug no longer exists in the current YAML spec.
- cobbal 3y agoYou say "S-expressions" like it's a standard, but it's really hundreds of different standards. Maybe someone needs to create nice websites for SON (scheme object notation), RON (racket object notation), ION (IMAP object notation), CLON, CLJON, ELON, R7RON (large and small), and the rest.