I think that's not the point that I want to highlight. The problem, however, is some drive-by contributors have unwillingness to accept feedback (including crit

I think that's not the point that I want to highlight. The problem, however, is some drive-by contributors have unwillingness to accept feedback (including critical reviews). When that behavior become a pattern within contributor's organization/domain, maintainers may take on the err side. For example, Linux kernel maintainers advise to not run checkpatch script on existing sources ([1], [2]). On a occasion, another maintainer had to roll out comment wording fixes after original submitter ignored the maintainer's review ([3]). And the well-known example is when an university was banned from Linux kernel development [4]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230720134501.01f9f1de@gandalf.local.home/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230720134501.01f9f1de@gandalf.... [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2023092730-shampoo-anytime-f437@gregkh/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/2023092730-shampoo-anytime-f437@... [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/162b5545-7d24-3cf2-9158-3100ef644e03@linux.intel.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/162b5545-7d24-3cf2-9158-3100ef64... [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/YH%2FfM%2FTsbmcZzwnX@kroah.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/YH%2FfM%2FTsbmcZzwnX@kroah...