3 ms·

Surely it's whoever puts up random historical facts, who should justify them with sources. The piece writer is a crooner, not a historian. Why would you take a

• keepamovin 3y ago
  Why would you judge someone based on their profession? By that logic discussions on HN should be limited to only those areas where someone is a known expert. Your comment seems suspiciously like an ad hominem attack, which is normally a sign of a weak position, and lacking a strong argument. Would you like to have another go?
  • toyg 3y ago
    > Why would you judge someone based on their profession? Good luck getting cancer-treatment tips by Steve Jobs. But I see what you're really doing here. Doesn't really matter, the post was rightly binned. Have a great day.
    • keepamovin 3y ago
      No I don't think you do. I'm interested > Surely it's whoever puts up random historical facts, who should justify them with sources. Yes quite. I posted an article, it seems to stand on its own. You claimed some other fact, but didn't provide a source. Perhaps your advice is wiser than you know! haha > Good luck getting cancer-treatment tips by Steve Jobs. Well lucky I never need them, but oh your edit is getting nastier isn't it? I get that you're not happy, but maybe you could explain your why, or provide some more sources?