4 ms·
Imo it is reasonable, but still disgusting. They don't want the public to know how they operate, because that reflects badly on them. A bit like you wouldn't ne
by red_trumpet 3y ago
Imo it is reasonable, but still disgusting. They don't want the public to know how they operate, because that reflects badly on them. A bit like you wouldn't necessarily tell your neighbor you're having an affair.
- repelsteeltje 3y ago> They don't want the public to know how they operate, because that reflects badly on them. Fair enough, if the way they operate is legal, but a trade secret/competitive advantage/... But since this is about antitrust, I'm hoping we'll get so see exactly how they operate with respect to allegedly violating the law.
- robertlagrant 3y ago> They don't want the public to know how they operate, because that reflects badly on them I think there's more to it than that. That may well be true, who knows, but it's also the endless punditry and click-baitery that will surround any information here, which will just spread "takes" and thus opinions with little basis in reality. That is to say, there is a legitimate fear that even a well-behaved organisation will be not understood as such when a pundit industry's salary depends on its not understanding it as such.
- smoldesu 3y agoAre there any FAANG companies that would want to show the public how they operate?