3 ms·
Or we just place constraints on "AI" controlling physical actions? As long as we can go back to, say, a 1950s technology level, humanity should be fine. I'd r
by eqvinox 3y ago
Or we just place constraints on "AI" controlling physical actions?
As long as we can go back to, say, a 1950s technology level, humanity should be fine. I'd rather just prevent machines from acquiring the means to forcibly constrain humanity from reverting to that…
(Going back to a 1950s technology level does not mean staying there. It means restarting from there, and make different mistakes the 2nd time around.)
- unglaublich 3y agoThat's not where we are at right now. Physical systems are insecurely interconnected already. It is likely possible to interact with e.g. the electricity grid through currently publicly unknown exploits. Maybe exploiting this does not lie within the realm of possibilities of humans, but it may lie in the realm of a computer program called AI.
- EvanAnderson 3y agoConsider exploits on the psychology of the humans running these loosely-coupled systems as an avenue of attack, too.