2 ms·
I assumed from the title that it was the same as FP. But you seemto contradict yourself; you say that PPT is FP, and then say that "it is not that similar"; th
by denton-scratch 3y ago
I assumed from the title that it was the same as FP.
But you seemto contradict yourself; you say that PPT is FP, and then say that "it is not that similar"; they can't be the same thing, and yet dissimilar.
- Sharlin 3y agoThe GP is ambiguous but I presume that they meant the Futur II in German is the same as future perfect tense in English, and neither is the same as the prophetic perfect tense.
- denton-scratch 3y agoOIC, maybe that makes sense. But I can't really tell, because the WP article didn't enlighten me.