4 ms·
Lets call it what it is without any bias. Twitter lost advertising because its a bad outlook, not because of technical issues. Twitter still works. Sure, it h
by ActorNightly 3y ago
Lets call it what it is without any bias.
Twitter lost advertising because its a bad outlook, not because of technical issues.
Twitter still works. Sure, it has issues, but still works. It definitely was a bloated company, and if Elon could keep his autism under reigns, he could have came out with reducing the company, keeping the same advertising income, and being more cash positive.
- wolverine876 3y ago> if Elon could keep his autism under reigns, he could have came out with reducing the company, keeping the same advertising income, and being more cash positive That's all your imagination - we can make and support any claim that way. The actual facts we have point the other way. Let's stop making Musk look like a victim. Nobody blames autism when Tesla's sales increase.
- ActorNightly 3y agoDon't let your hate boner for Musk replace your brain. Nothing in your post addresses what I said. I never mentioned Musk is a victim.
- epups 3y agoIt is very possible, in fact likely, that gutting a ton of people directly involved in ad-related work - sales, press management, content monitoring, etc - had a negative impact on advertising revenue.
- ActorNightly 3y agoYes, but that doesn't preclude the fact that Twitter had 7500 employees prior to layoffs, without anything really to show for it. He could have still trimmed a lot, while keeping the relevant people in place.
- epups 3y ago> Yes, but that doesn't preclude the fact that Twitter had 7500 employees prior to layoffs, without anything really to show for it. Well, they had 3x or 4x more income and market value than Twitter with fewer employees. That's quite a lot to show for it.
- ActorNightly 3y agoAnd all of that wasnt due to extra engineers and personnel, it was due to the audience on the core product that had no real new features.