all the quotes are out of context in that article. i doubt they said anything to that effect. My bet, if I could see the talk somewhere, is that he referred t

all the quotes are out of context in that article. i doubt they said anything to that effect. My bet, if I could see the talk somewhere, is that he referred to the attacker as something generic (not "china") and then on another point talked about China's trouble with intellectual property as when they sell counterfeited cisco gear or use code from one US company manufacturing there on a huwaei product, etc. and the journalist just cut, mixed, and published the bomb about china being the attackers. of course the article may only have the worst quote choices and that's exactly what he said.