3 ms·
I assume you understand that the vast majority of the tap water is not in that category?
by fooker 3y ago
I assume you understand that the vast majority of the tap water is not in that category?
- mint2 3y agoWell I’d hazard a guess that this new desal method isn’t cheaper than well water for rural areas where that’s an option. Or surface water for areas with plentiful rain. And I’d further hazard a guess that their cost analysis hasn’t scaled up or thought about distribution. And their invention is pretty useless for people inland since then it requires the distribution that makes many of the other systems costly. Basically the title is PR bunk is what I’m saying.
- api_or_ipa 3y agoTap water has to come from somewhere. Dig a well, dam a river or desal the ocean, they all have significant costs to produce, treat, and distribute the water. Even if you did build one of these devices outside your house, you'd still need to pressurize and plumb it into your house's water supply. Simply producing water is but one step among many to make that water usable.