3 ms·
With all due respect, your model as described is different: the way I read it is that you're charging for work, not charging for a product incorporating your wo
by tadfisher 3y ago
With all due respect, your model as described is different: the way I read it is that you're charging for work, not charging for a product incorporating your work. The same tension doesn't exist, because you don't have an incentive to paywall a feature; if someone pays you, everyone benefits.
Forgive me if I'm off-base with my interpretation of your comment.
- 38 3y ago> if someone pays you, everyone benefits. this is not guaranteed to be the case. if its a feature I dont care about, then likely I will just implement it privately and provide the modified code privately. It would only be if someone was going to be an ongoing donor that I would defer to their concerns regarding public release of any feature requests.