I don't think photographs are generally advertised as "open source", because there is not generally a source code form of a photograph. The MIT license doesn't

I don't think photographs are generally advertised as "open source", because there is not generally a source code form of a photograph. The MIT license doesn't distinguish between binaries and source, but the GPL does. The GPL defines source code as: > The “source code” for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. “Object code” means any non-source form of a work. What is the preferred form of an LLM for making modifications to it?