3 ms·
That's pretty circular. To the extent any company, A, relies on company B to operate, A can be destroyed by B, according the definition of "rely". So the logic
by danielmarkbruce 3y ago
That's pretty circular. To the extent any company, A, relies on company B to operate, A can be destroyed by B, according the definition of "rely".
So the logical response wasn't to assume you were being circular. The logical response was to assume you were inferring Amazon is big enough and capable enough to squash any business.
- BizarroLand 3y agoAnd yet it is obvious in retrospect that I didn't mean entirely independent multi-billion dollar empires, but that is the response everyone went with.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- danielmarkbruce 3y agoIt clearly wasn't obvious to most given the responses.
- BizarroLand 3y agoMaybe not to you