4 ms·
If the goal is widespread industry adoption, I'd recommend the approach of extending a professional, standards-based interchange format already supported by maj
by CharlesW 3y ago
If the goal is widespread industry adoption, I'd recommend the approach of extending a professional, standards-based interchange format already supported by major DAWs: AAF.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Authoring_Format https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Authoring_Format
https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000004.shtml https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd0000...
- conradfr 3y agoThe README extensively references AAF.
- thrtythreeforty 3y agoIndeed. This is a Bitwig project. I think the default for Bitwig engineering should be "assume extreme competence."
- moleperson 3y agoWhat's wrong with Bitwig engineering?
- russelg 3y agoNothing, they are praising the engineers.
- CharlesW 3y agoYes, which is why the Yet Another Standard approach is so mystifying. Bitwig is surely aware that AAF has wide support and could easily be extended to support everything they want to do.