4 ms·
I'm reasonably sure this book is still under copyright. It seems that a lot of people don't care about that for certain books.
by _kst_ 3y ago
I'm reasonably sure this book is still under copyright.
It seems that a lot of people don't care about that for certain books.
- fsckboy 3y agothe arc of 1000 unlicensed copies begins with your first curl
- euiq 3y agoIntellectual property rights should be abolished.
- matheusmoreira 3y agoCompletely agree.
- russh 3y agoThat's a slippery slope. First, it's only the Intellectual property rights, then the Intellectual property, and finally, the Intellectual.
- oarabbus_ 3y agoThere are countries in which there is no IP protection, it's not the utopia you think it is.
- jackblemming 3y agoThe comments in this thread are about respecting copyright and if Tao is culturally insensitive. Is this really “hacker” news? What the hell happened to this generation? Did the establishment win?
- 22289d 3y agoSomething won, this place is a lot different than I remember it.
- CapsAdmin 3y agoAt the time of writing there is exactly one question about copyright and one question if this might be culturally insensitive. Regarding if it's culturally insensitive, the majority that replied disagreed that it was. Maybe something like 2 comments saying it is. There's 1 that says it is, which got downvoted, and the other seems to be making a case as to why it could possibly be. Not exactly a win in my opinion.