Deno is just trying to compete with other JS/TS SaaS with this. Vercel/NextJS has a KV service now; Cloudflare has it; in other cases it's Firebase. I contend

Deno is just trying to compete with other JS/TS SaaS with this. Vercel/NextJS has a KV service now; Cloudflare has it; in other cases it's Firebase. I contend that this is not actually forward thinking, but monetising Deno as a SaaS, which every man and his dog is doing in the JS world lately with their 'cloud' offerings (reselling AWS with a framework). That's why there is a pricing page attached to this. If Deno's KV depends on FoundationDB then they're hardly going to build adapters over other databases - switching DB tech is always a massive ordeal because they all have different use-cases and performance characteristics.