4 ms·
Is that pretty obvious? Better in what contexts? I've seen someone here say that they really liked working with a virtual display from wherever, but the resolu
by abeppu 3y ago
Is that pretty obvious? Better in what contexts?
I've seen someone here say that they really liked working with a virtual display from wherever, but the resolution of their whole display was 1080p. As someone who regularly uses dual 4k external monitors plus my laptop, I didn't understand how they could be productive. E.g. I may want to keep a browser with docs and a jupyter notebook of a particular investigation on my left, and an IDE of my repo on my right, plus chat with the colleague I'm working with below on my laptop, and all showing a lot of text or perhaps detailed graphs. If 8k monitors cross my affordability threshold before XR headsets with 4k (per eye) cross my affordability threshold, I would likely switch to more physical-screen pixels than to cut down to just 4k pixels strapped to my face.
- fomine3 3y agoPortability is an obvious pros for virtual displays. It can be used on any hotels only with less than 1kg HMD and accessories.