2 ms·
I think it’s more likely these people mainly enjoy designing hardware, not tools for designing hardware (aka software). Learn to use a tool, and use it. It’s a
by ip26 3y ago
I think it’s more likely these people mainly enjoy designing hardware, not tools for designing hardware (aka software). Learn to use a tool, and use it. It’s a hammer, start driving nails
Software development is unique in that tools for building software are also software. This hammer is great and all, but I make hammers, and I know this one could be better
- mathisfun123 3y agoThis is apologetics. The real reason is the hardware vendors are entrenched and don't make money off the software at all. The situation is exactly the same as it was in the proprietary compiler space before gcc (and then clang) - no incentive to improve or open source the compilers -> no access to good tools -> proprietary tools remain only option. Yosys though, being an open source attempt, is just making unforced errors, hence my ranting and raving in the other thread.
- spear 3y agoYou're talking about FPGA tools but this thread is about VLSI design where the major EDA vendors (Synopsys, Cadence, and Mentor) don't sell hardware(*) and *do* make a lot of money from software. (*) Excluding emulators or simulation accelerators.
- mathisfun123 3y ago> You're talking about FPGA tools but this thread is about VLSI design did you miss the part where the comment i'm responding to is about VTR?
- ip26 3y agoMy bad, I thought we were talking about ASIC designers, not VTR developers.