3 ms·
And this is weird to me. As a software engineer, who works with text all the time, I was buying IPS panels with as high resolution as I was able to justify for
by galkk 3y ago
And this is weird to me. As a software engineer, who works with text all the time, I was buying IPS panels with as high resolution as I was able to justify for my entire career.
I don't see myself coding it quest, it is just too blurry.
Although this could be me and my personal preferences, as I also cannot program on something like macbook air 13", and there are people who can easily do it.
I used dual 2k 27" more than 10 years ago, now the main screen that I look at is 4k 32" and there are 2 2k 27" side by side. If linux didn't suck with mixed dpis and there were 240Hz IPS 27" (I use one of them for gaming), I'd already start considering 4k 27".
---
Having said all of that, I certainly believe that there will be time when the FOV and resolution will be enough to replace monitors.
Like now, I have 3 monitors because I don't want to dance with workspaces etc. I still can focus only on one at one time.
Intelligent zoom and activation of windows/workspaces, improved to one that Apple shown in visionpro presentation, will be killer feature, as I objectively will be able to have multiple 4k screens without any table space used by monitors.