>A lot of the output is going to be nonsense, especially stuff that cannot be verified just by looking at it. Isn't that exactly the point, and why there shoul

>A lot of the output is going to be nonsense, especially stuff that cannot be verified just by looking at it. Isn't that exactly the point, and why there should be a 'warning/awareness' that it is not a 160 IQ AI but a very good markov chain that can sometimes infer things and other time hallucinate/put random words in a very well articulated way (echo of Sokal maybe)