3 ms·
There's all sorts of ways to categorize languages. Why group by "high-level" (whatever that means) and gc? Why not say "why compare rust and go - go belongs i
by sophacles 3y ago
There's all sorts of ways to categorize languages.
Why group by "high-level" (whatever that means) and gc?
Why not say "why compare rust and go - go belongs in the minimal type system category with zig, C, python, lisp. rust belongs in the inferred thpe system category with haskell, ocaml, f# and so on"?
Or (as is the case with the article), why not group them by popularity for a domain/task and do a comparison in that light?