3 ms·
By that logic why wouldn’t the maximum be at 168 hours? Clearly there is some cost to more hours that causes the maximum to be at strictly less than the maximu
by zeroonetwothree 3y ago
By that logic why wouldn’t the maximum be at 168 hours?
Clearly there is some cost to more hours that causes the maximum to be at strictly less than the maximum. Given that we have no reason to assume 40 hours is better than 32 hours.