4 ms·
> It's a non-sensical argument. Your take is equally non-sensical. There is no magical constant unit of time that represents maximum productivity. It’s all rel
by eric_cc 3y ago
> It's a non-sensical argument.
Your take is equally non-sensical. There is no magical constant unit of time that represents maximum productivity. It’s all relative and fluid. It’s based on many many variables. And even if such a time existed for one person in one company for one week, it wouldn’t be neatly packaged like “40 hours”. It would likely seem random like 34 hours 20 minutes and 25 seconds.
Arguing over such a universal time is as much a waste a time as arguing over the perfect diet. It’s relative.