The latest models generate original combinations that can surprise the prompter with their inventiveness, so your confident assertions about what LLMs can't do

The latest models generate original combinations that can surprise the prompter with their inventiveness, so your confident assertions about what LLMs can't do seems calibrated to the models of a year or more ago – and not at all an enduring human advantage that one could bank a career (or society) on. Attempts to rigorously study the relative creativity of LLMs have already found them more creative than average humans: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40858-3 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40858-3 They're only getting better, fast. If you're not convinced, what GPT4-level (text or multimodal) or Midjourney-level (imagery) models have you tried, and how much?