3 ms·

I don't agree with your point, but I love that Facebook released llama into the open. I realized it's not necessarily to undercut their competitors, either. The

I don't agree with your point, but I love that Facebook released llama into the open. I realized it's not necessarily to undercut their competitors, either. Their revenue grows when high quality content is easier to create. If they commoditize the process of creating content, they make more money. Commoditize your compliment.

gmerc 3y ago
High quality content is not a concern for Facebook
- Gh0stRAT 3y ago
  >High quality content is not a concern for Facebook [Citation needed] I'd say it's a huge concern due to its strong correlation with increased usage and thus ad revenue.
  - gmerc 3y ago
    For the time I worked there the metric was engagement (with occasional Cares about Facebook intermissions). One look at newsfeed tells you it’s ad revenue now. Quality has nothing to do with it unless you define quality as clickbait. In fact, citation needed on “high correlation” unless you take a meta press release which are notoriously misleading. Like 3% of the platform being news
- esafak 3y ago
  Good enough to share, cheap to create.