4 ms·

Huh? I don’t see any further close readings. Empty promises.

Apocryphon 3y ago
Looks like you need to learn how to read text that is not present in my post.
smoldesu 3y ago
Here is the proof that the iPad is a computer: https://www.apple.com/ipad-pro/specs/ https://www.apple.com/ipad-pro/specs/ Any questions, or do you still want to whinge over how "turing completeness isn't computation!"? You're welcome to it, but quite obviously the Digital Markets Act has nothing to do with it. Apple would be a designated gatekeeper if they sold Cuisinart blenders, now they have to cope or leave the relevant markets. It's truly shocking to me how some people are willing to write multiple pages of comments in response to this. Half the people in this thread are replying to every positive comment they can find crying "Atlas Shrugged!" like bloody murder.
- shuckles 3y ago
  There are microprocessors with storage in any object you can buy, so obviously your evidence that iPad is a computer is pretty casual. I don’t think the DMA will change much but do find it funny how many people think they are defending human freedom by getting a convoluted process to run emulators, uBlock, and piracy apps on their phone.
  - smoldesu 3y ago
    > how many people think they are defending human freedom So... what's a better way to defend human freedom? Letting market conditions deteriorate further? Tell it to me like you're trying to convince the European regulators, not like you're sitting across from Tim Cook. Petty solutions are a non-starter.
    - shuckles 3y ago
      European regulators are idiots who have spent nearly half a decade trying to undermine end to end encryption. If I were them, I’d say their best chance at defending human freedom would be to make nuclear reactors easy to build, not engaging in some boondoggle about how easy it is to install some apps on a phone. This will end up being as useful as GDPR privacy notices and cookie consents on websites.
      - smoldesu 3y ago
        > European regulators are idiots who have spent nearly half a decade trying to undermine end to end encryption. How exactly are they different from Apple, then? Why didn't Apple resist their incorporation into FIVE-EYES and Europe's surveillance network? > If I were them, I’d say their best chance at defending human freedom would be to make nuclear reactors easy to build That's the Free Market's job. If the world's largest company was a nuclear reactor business and not a smartphone one, maybe they'd be doing it. > This will end up being as useful as GDPR privacy notices and cookie consents on websites. Or as effective as their USB-C regulation. Time will tell, eh?
        shuckles 3y ago
        > How exactly are they different from Apple, then Because Apple sells the highest security mass market consumer device ever made? Because Apple brought easy to use, end to end encryption to the masses with iMessage? No clue what your point here is besides regurgitating some non-specific conspiracy theory about the extent of Apple’s cooperation with the government. > That's the Free Market's job. Regulation is not the free market’s job, as you evidently believe since you are so excited about digital markets regulation. Maybe they could start by not categorizing wood pellets shipped across the Atlantic and produced from strip mining forests in southeastern United States as “green energy.” > Or as effective as their USB-C regulation How was USB-C regulation effective? Yeah Apple complied, but are customers’ lives better? In aggregate? By what metric? I for one had to buy a new iPhone cable for the first time in half a decade to connect my phone to my car. By its stated aims, the regulation was not effective in my case.
  - Apocryphon 3y ago
    Tell it to the right to repair farmer-hackers. Same category of concerns.

Looks like you need to learn how to read text that is not present in my post.

Here is the proof that the iPad is a computer: https://www.apple.com/ipad-pro/specs/ https://www.apple.com/ipad-pro/specs/ Any questions, or do you still want to whinge over how "turing completeness isn't computation!"? You're welcome to it, but quite obviously the Digital Markets Act has nothing to do with it. Apple would be a designated gatekeeper if they sold Cuisinart blenders, now they have to cope or leave the relevant markets. It's truly shocking to me how some people are willing to write multiple pages of comments in response to this. Half the people in this thread are replying to every positive comment they can find crying "Atlas Shrugged!" like bloody murder.

shuckles 3y ago
There are microprocessors with storage in any object you can buy, so obviously your evidence that iPad is a computer is pretty casual. I don’t think the DMA will change much but do find it funny how many people think they are defending human freedom by getting a convoluted process to run emulators, uBlock, and piracy apps on their phone.
- smoldesu 3y ago
  > how many people think they are defending human freedom So... what's a better way to defend human freedom? Letting market conditions deteriorate further? Tell it to me like you're trying to convince the European regulators, not like you're sitting across from Tim Cook. Petty solutions are a non-starter.
  - shuckles 3y ago
    European regulators are idiots who have spent nearly half a decade trying to undermine end to end encryption. If I were them, I’d say their best chance at defending human freedom would be to make nuclear reactors easy to build, not engaging in some boondoggle about how easy it is to install some apps on a phone. This will end up being as useful as GDPR privacy notices and cookie consents on websites.
    - smoldesu 3y ago
      > European regulators are idiots who have spent nearly half a decade trying to undermine end to end encryption. How exactly are they different from Apple, then? Why didn't Apple resist their incorporation into FIVE-EYES and Europe's surveillance network? > If I were them, I’d say their best chance at defending human freedom would be to make nuclear reactors easy to build That's the Free Market's job. If the world's largest company was a nuclear reactor business and not a smartphone one, maybe they'd be doing it. > This will end up being as useful as GDPR privacy notices and cookie consents on websites. Or as effective as their USB-C regulation. Time will tell, eh?
      - shuckles 3y ago
        > How exactly are they different from Apple, then Because Apple sells the highest security mass market consumer device ever made? Because Apple brought easy to use, end to end encryption to the masses with iMessage? No clue what your point here is besides regurgitating some non-specific conspiracy theory about the extent of Apple’s cooperation with the government. > That's the Free Market's job. Regulation is not the free market’s job, as you evidently believe since you are so excited about digital markets regulation. Maybe they could start by not categorizing wood pellets shipped across the Atlantic and produced from strip mining forests in southeastern United States as “green energy.” > Or as effective as their USB-C regulation How was USB-C regulation effective? Yeah Apple complied, but are customers’ lives better? In aggregate? By what metric? I for one had to buy a new iPhone cable for the first time in half a decade to connect my phone to my car. By its stated aims, the regulation was not effective in my case.
- Apocryphon 3y ago
  Tell it to the right to repair farmer-hackers. Same category of concerns.