4 ms·
Show me the 19th century sources saying otherwise. If it is the correct opinion then it shouldn't be hard. You cannot just say that everyone who disagrees with
by agensaequivocum 3y ago
Show me the 19th century sources saying otherwise. If it is the correct opinion then it shouldn't be hard. You cannot just say that everyone who disagrees with you misunderstands the 2A. If your opinion is correct then surely someone wrote about it prior to the 20th century. The thread I linked has many many more quotes I highly recommend you look at.
This is why the Bruen opinion is so great. It uses the historical understanding approach. Which should be applied to the 1A as well.
- woodruffw 3y agoNo, I'm not going to play the Gish gallop slap-fight game over the wrong century. Here's an example of the conservative AEI making essentially the same point[1]: that a constitutionally framed democratic sovereign cannot enshrine a right of revolution, even if the individual right of revolution is an inalienable one. This is basic political theory, whether you choose to take a historical approach or not. [1]: https://www.aei.org/articles/is-there-an-american-right-of-revolution/ https://www.aei.org/articles/is-there-an-american-right-of-r...