4 ms·
> who takes a photo then wants to know it was a photo of? I find myself doing this rather frequently. The scenario described in the article is quite common for
by BoxFour 3y ago
> who takes a photo then wants to know it was a photo of?
I find myself doing this rather frequently. The scenario described in the article is quite common for me: capturing a photo of a plant and utilizing an existing classification service to determine its identity. It could be driven by mere curiosity or practical concerns like identifying whether a plant is poison ivy.
Wildlife identification also falls into this category. Recognizing different bird species can be challenging, especially when it's not a familiar species like a blue jay. I often find myself engaging in this activity quite regularly!
EDIT: I should also point out this happens with other forms of ‘unknown object identification’. There’s an entire subreddit that’s quite popular devoted to just crowd-sourcing identification based on a picture.
- joshuahedlund 3y ago> Recognizing different bird species can be challenging, especially when it's not a familiar species like a blue jay. FYI Cornell Lab's Merlin app is fantastic at this, and its bird call audio identification is even better. They obviously have some top-notch machine learning going on there, and I'm really curious to see how both they and other services innovate on this front in the months to come.
- ldhough 3y ago> Wildlife identification Wouldn't say this is super reliable, I gave it a photo of a small squid in my hand and it said it was a baby fish (very obviously was not a fish).