2 ms·
Right - because this library tries to fake a new language syntax feature without the actual support for it, it ends up being the worst of both worlds. Even igno
by madeofpalk 3y ago
Right - because this library tries to fake a new language syntax feature without the actual support for it, it ends up being the worst of both worlds. Even ignoring the lines-of-code explosion, the non-standard use of parens/spacing makes it incredible difficult for me to parse.
Props to the author for trying out something neat, but this is probably a bit to clever for my liking.
- spoiler 3y ago> the non-standard use of parens/spacing makes it incredible difficult for me to parse. Same here. Not to mention this wouldn't work in a codebase with an autoformatter.The idea/API is clever. So, a pretty cool experiment I suppose
- FroLeMageBlanc 3y agoAuthor here. Thanks for your nice comment. I added a note to say it does work with autoformatters too. Actually someone in a comment below said he or she prefers the autoformatted syntax.
- spoiler 3y agoOh, that's good to know! I haven't tried it and assumed an auto formatter might misalign some of it or put things on the same line, so the visual "downward arrow" appearance would be lost Edit: I just checked the docs again and while it does look a bit "misaligned" at the start, I do think it looks more readable with the autoformatted version. Pretty cool!
- newtom 3y agoJust an FYI to folks, there has been a proposal to add pipes to JavaScript for a few years: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator