2 ms·
After some googling, looks like the answer is: it depends :) E.g. in this article (https://showbusinessinsights.com/2014/06/24/the-most-stunning-theatre-royal-b
by rob74 3y ago
After some googling, looks like the answer is: it depends :) E.g. in this article (https://showbusinessinsights.com/2014/06/24/the-most-stunning-theatre-royal-boxes-in-the-world/ https://showbusinessinsights.com/2014/06/24/the-most-stunnin...) 5 of 6 boxes are in the middle, the only one at the side being from a British theatre. So maybe this is more of a British tradition? I guess both have their advantages and disadvantages - at the back the occupants have more privacy and a better general view, at the side it's easier to build a separate entrance, and the box is closer to the stage.
- mdpye 3y agoI was also given to understand that while boxes give optional privacy, a big part of their function in older theatres was to be seen, rather than specifically to see the play. Presiding, if you will. At least that's the oral tradition I've been given in the UK. Makes sense for the old aristocracy, the US may have wanted to make a deliberate break with the tradition?
- heresie-dabord 3y ago> to make a deliberate break with the tradition In the monarchical period of European theatre, it was well-understood that the centre was a _pit_ full of hard-scrabble riff-raff. Having a box apart from this was a sign of social class (i.e. _wealth_ and aristocratic connexions).
- aidos 3y agoIn either case the boxes are a level above the riff-raff. In one case they’re at the back (but still above) and in the other they’re nearer the front on the side.