5 ms·
GNU – Celebrating 40 Years
- nonrandomstring 3y agoAnother important anniversary. I wonder how well this thread will compare with "25 years of Google" [0] As a 50 year old, GNU has been there in the background for most of my life as a computing professional. It has not grown much as an organisation or ideas base, but clung firmly to timeless principles. That continuity and longevity is testimony to the power of an ideal, that computing belongs in the hands of the people, as a tool and not as a weapon in the hands of those who seek domination. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37669341 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37669341
- dartos 3y agoIt’s faring much worse, sadly
- ChrisArchitect 3y agoExcept that GNU anniversary page had been around for months, and posted a few times already (and ignored mostly on here), while the Google 25 content is fresh today, if comparing news response.
- sidkshatriya 3y agoGNU has much to be proud of. It pioneered the use of "copyleft" and has produced a stream of influential software that is critical even today. For me the greatest achievement of GNU is proving that software does not need to be proprietary. There was a time when Windows and other proprietary Unixes ruled the roost. Due to the easy availability of fundamental GNU software at the right time we saw the cambrian explosion of open computing software during the internet era. However, GNU seems to have not changed (enough) with the times. A new breed of open source software is steadily chipping away at GNU's monopoly (e.g. LLVM, musl etc). GNU's website, tooling and codebase increasingly looks outdated, monolithic and crusty. Sure there are gems still to be found in GNU's software stable. I also like that they hold fast to certain noble software principles. TL;DR GNU needs to reinvent and refresh itself while still preserving its core principles.
- larodi 3y agoI can't help but think that the idea of copyleft was already pioneered and applied during the same time in the Soviet block of countries, where virtually copyright did not exist. Of course without all the fanfares... So it was all copyleft, right? Definitely can remember us look with "awe and wonder" at Lawrence Lessig when he first visited one university in one ex-soviet country to lecture about the value of sharing software to a room full of people that have never ever in their life bought any.
- extraduder_ire 3y agoThe key thing about "copyleft" is that it uses copyright mechanisms to ensure the code stays free (as in freedom). This is different than disowning/ignoring copyright, and more of an inversion of how proprietary software works. Pirating software doesn't help too much when you want to study/modify it.
- tetris11 3y agoI see suckless[0] tools as the spiritual successor to GNU. Free, open source (and I think copyleft?), minimal, and encapsulates a comprehensive desktop experience. I think no-bloat should be GNUs next philosophy. 0: https://suckless.org/ https://suckless.org/
- foul 3y agoAnd its wonky spinoff bitreich
- ReactiveJelly 3y agoI can't find it, but I remember a quote something like this > The initial GNU announcement was crazy. Rewriting all of Unix? It was like Stallman had said, "I need help building a free rocket ship to Mars, and I'm getting started right after I finish this Thanksgiving dinner." I hope to one day be known for 1 really crazy idea that somehow paid off, and not the 999 obviously bad ideas that it took to get there.
- commandlinefan 3y agoWow, for some reason I would have guessed that GNU was older than I am, but I'm almost 10 years older than it.