3 ms·
You're completely ignoring my point. The journalist was rewarded with murder. I feel like you're not actually considering what I'm saying and I'm exiting this
by OnlineGladiator 3y ago
You're completely ignoring my point. The journalist was rewarded with murder.
I feel like you're not actually considering what I'm saying and I'm exiting this conversation.
- afavour 3y agoYour point is that because one journalist was killed for a story that no other journalist could ever possibly be rewarded for breaking a huge story?
- InSteady 3y agoYou know how there is a principle during debate where you should treat your opponent's argument charitably, by taking their meaning in the best possible way? You just did the exact opposite.