3 ms·
They're pretty clear about it in the text; it's just the headline that's misleading: > The overall job growth included 20,524 White workers. The other 302,570
by Paul-Craft 3y ago
They're pretty clear about it in the text; it's just the headline that's misleading:
> The overall job growth included 20,524 White workers. The other 302,570 jobs — or 94% of the headcount increase — went to people of color.
"Overall job growth" and "headcount increase" imply "net jobs added."
- Khelavaster 3y agoThey're not saying only 20,524 white workers were hired.
- Paul-Craft 3y agoNo, they're not. They're saying 20,524 more white people were employed at the end of the period than at the beginning. That is what a plain language reading of the text says. I don't know what you're trying to imply here.