4 ms·
The commenter started by saying they didn't see any downsides. Someone replied referring to specific downsides which impacted them (""use Meta omni-permission s
by shuckles 3y ago
The commenter started by saying they didn't see any downsides. Someone replied referring to specific downsides which impacted them (""use Meta omni-permission store or get cut off from FB/IG/WhatsApp"). Then the commenter said downsides don't matter because they can be used to argue against any change. That's a different argument than where they started.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago> "use Meta omni-permission store or get cut off from FB/IG/WhatsApp" They replied to the comment which said this and wrote, "I see no downsides." I don’t see where they admitted to the downsides.
- shuckles 3y agoThat's not the comment I replied to. I replied to the comment where they offered no argument for why someone else's downside was invalid, instead opting to say that it's better to not let downsides prevent action. The lack of argument implied they didn't have a response, which I sought to confirm.
- maxwell 3y agoNope, no downsides.
- shuckles 3y agoYou can believe whatever you want, but try not to impose it on others.