4 ms·
Wouldn't jump to that conclusion. It showed me a 0.xx% (i.e. a number less than 1%) just due to the "no JS" alone. So not allowing JS is a strong identifier on
by eh_why_not 3y ago
Wouldn't jump to that conclusion.
It showed me a 0.xx% (i.e. a number less than 1%) just due to the "no JS" alone. So not allowing JS is a strong identifier on its own.
- autoexec 3y agoNot allowing JS cuts them off from a ton of specific data points in exchange for one big general one. Honestly I think the trick is to present a different unique fingerprint each time. It doesn't matter if you standout so long as each session can't be linked to all your previous ones. That seems a lot easier to pull off than trying to blend in perfectly with the crowd. I wouldn't bet on my efforts to account for everything that might uniquely ID me in a never ending game of Whac-A-Mole with fingerprinters. They seem to find new tricks all the time.