3 ms·
Consider the source. If you poke around the about us section, there's not much there, so it's not clear what their legal or reporting, etc. bona fides are. You
by dfxm12 3y ago
Consider the source. If you poke around the about us section, there's not much there, so it's not clear what their legal or reporting, etc. bona fides are. You gotta take it as amateur journalism and be glad there is at least a link to the decision.
- gnicholas 3y agoI read lots of law blogs (former lawyer) and some of the language used made it seem very law-blog-ish. For example, non-lawyers typically don't note/congratulate the attorneys representing one party or the other, which this post did at the end. That's why it was so weird to have the word "impunity" mixed in at various places, which is something a lawyer or legal-focused journalist would not do (especially "claim of impunity" in the headline).
- riffic 3y agothe site has been previously known to be the work of Edward Hasbrouck (https://icannwiki.org/Edward_Hasbrouck https://icannwiki.org/Edward_Hasbrouck) His name still seems to be on the author byline in this post.