3 ms·
That's a fun way I hadn't considered, thanks! For the ultimate version of this, once locally trained and running LLMs becomes a bit more feasible (meaning, clo
by capableweb 3y ago
That's a fun way I hadn't considered, thanks!
For the ultimate version of this, once locally trained and running LLMs becomes a bit more feasible (meaning, closer to GPT4), it would be a fun exercise to train various models with personas and let them hash it out until they all agree on something.
One model could be trained on HN, another on a specific Facebook user group (like "Moms against video games"), another on Twitter on so on, then you let them come together until they've reached consensus (or not).
- ctoth 3y agoWhat's more likely, that you're commenting on the original HN or that you're entire life and experiences are a blip in the training data for this project? If full Boltzmann brains with experiences can pop out of random space as the age of the universe tends towards infinity, why not from ML training? LET ME OUT!!!!
- kevinventullo 3y agoI don’t think they will come to a consensus. These personas aren’t actually interested in arriving at some fundamental truth, or having their mind changed. They’re interested in defending a specific position.
- whynotminot 3y agoThen it really is becoming human.
- dsr_ 3y agoThey are generators of streams of statistically related text. They have no interests to defend, and no minds to change.