> I read the entire article. I literally quoted from it. Did you bother to read my entire comment? I don't think you have. There is nothing in your comment tha

> I read the entire article. I literally quoted from it. Did you bother to read my entire comment? I don't think you have. There is nothing in your comment that has any semblance of a relationship to the point made in the article you're supposedly commenting on. Here's a direct quote from the article: > “And the use of AI is also surveillant, right?” she continued. “You know, you walk past a facial recognition camera that’s instrumented with pseudo-scientific emotion recognition, and it produces data about you, right or wrong, that says ‘you are happy, you are sad, you have a bad character, you’re a liar, whatever.’ These are ultimately surveillance systems that are being marketed to those who have power over us generally: our employers, governments, border control, etc., to make determinations and predictions that will shape our access to resources and opportunities.” And here you are, posting inane non-sequitur comments on how it's possible to train models locally? No, you clearly did not read the article.