3 ms·
If you've followed the Unity debacle I assume you've already read about this, but a cursory search for "Ironsource malware" on google yields: https://www.games
by debaserab2 3y ago
If you've followed the Unity debacle I assume you've already read about this, but a cursory search for "Ironsource malware" on google yields:
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/unity-ironsource-malware-came-from-bad-actors-who-tried-to-abuse-the-platform https://www.gamesindustry.biz/unity-ironsource-malware-came-...
https://www.pcgamer.com/unity-is-merging-with-a-company-who-made-a-malware-installer/ https://www.pcgamer.com/unity-is-merging-with-a-company-who-...
- qwytw 3y agoIs there any indication all of the IronSource or other ad stuff will not be optional? Not allowing developers to remove it from their games would certainly be a step too far (at this time anyway, who know what will they come up with in a couple of years).
- anankaie 3y agoThe problem is that there is no way to trust that Unity will not alter the deal in an underhanded way in the future. I do not want my purchases beholden to their capricious whims. I sympathize with the devs, but sometimes it turns out that platform decisions made in the past are bad. It is what it is.
- qwytw 3y agoTrue, but there are certain things (e.g. including spyware in games not using their analytics and/or ads solution) some of their important customers would never tolerate. Then again they might just make no-"spyware" a "feature" only available in enterprise versions...