It is much higher. From the guardian article, the "analysis" this link discusses: "39 ... were categorised as likely junk", "Eight others (16%) look problemati

It is much higher. From the guardian article, the "analysis" this link discusses: "39 ... were categorised as likely junk", "Eight others (16%) look problematic", "the remaining three projects (6%) could not be determined definitively". The original article was submitted here too, but didnt get any upvotes. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/19/do-carbon-credit-reduce-emissions-greenhouse-gases?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/19/do-carbo...