5 ms·
> The fact that he had to go to Substack to publish the Nordstream investigation (...) Doesn't his investigation basically consists of citing a single unnamed
by rewmie 3y ago
> The fact that he had to go to Substack to publish the Nordstream investigation (...)
Doesn't his investigation basically consists of citing a single unnamed source that failed to substantiate any of it's wild claims?
- redder23 3y agoRead my other comment about the "unnamed source". You just eat up the propaganda from the legacy media. You for sure would be want to be named if you were the source. Sy Hersh is a senior master investigative reporter, he trusts his source and people with a brain trust him. Biden said his administration will end Nordstream 2 and so he did: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSPfXLPUJHM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSPfXLPUJHM how brainwashed did you have to be to not believe the obvious. Its not "wild claim" there was the threat and then there was the fulfilled promise.
- rewmie 3y ago> Read my other comment about the "unnamed source". You just eat up the propaganda from the legacy media. You failed to present any basis for your personal assertion, and instead you only doubled-down on accusatory conspiracy theories. That's not the ideal reaction to someone pointing out your conspiracy theory is unsubstantiated and unsourced. A little rational, objective thinking goes a long way.