Yes, Bergson is not only completely wrong, but lazily and proudly wrong. He is either: - an early proto-Post-Modernist, who denies anything they don't advocat

Yes, Bergson is not only completely wrong, but lazily and proudly wrong. He is either: - an early proto-Post-Modernist, who denies anything they don't advocate can be true; - an early woo-quantum-consciousness connector of mysteries, all mysteries are each other's explanations. Would, perhaps, Mr Bergson be a French philosopher?