3 ms·

You really need Maps to figure out where your gate is at the airport? Honestly?

a11r 3y ago
For people with mobility challenges, or those with communication challenges, being able to look at a map of the airport and plan in advance is useful.
- aldarisbm 3y ago
  https://imgur.com/a/XpdiWer https://imgur.com/a/XpdiWer If i know which gate I'm going to, this is what I would do. Google for my gate
  - s3p 3y ago
    To each their own then?
moolcool 3y ago
It is extremely handy to have a map of airport gates. Airports can be very big, and a gate you're transferring to can be a ~20 minute walk away from your arrival gate. Signage usually is sufficient to get you where you want to go, but seldom tells you how long it will take to get there.
- aldarisbm 3y ago
  I agree, but I think software (although with accessibility in mind, and on the forefront) should be designed for the majority of users with toggles for different use-cases eg a11y. I dont remember the last time I had to check how far away my gates were unless in another terminal, and when that case arises there are ways to look at distance, by being explicit on google maps. Most of the time I'm looking for the starbucks or bathroom or where I can grab a bite. -- I travel for work
pretext-1 3y ago
In big airports, such as FRA, it can take 50 minutes to walk to the gate (if you’re lucky enough to have your gate in terminal 1). Checking the map is useful to see the estimated walking time and to get an overview of the route if you’re not already familiar with the airport. However seeing the locations of the nearest fast food restaurants on the map is superfluous: they’re everywhere. My gate however is only in one location.
- aldarisbm 3y ago
  I guess my point is that you can _still_ do that. It's not this OR that, it can be this and that. You can still put your gate in google and it will give you walking directions.
  - pretext-1 3y ago
    I think OP’s point was that Google Maps prioritizes profitable POIs over useful POIs. Profit over UX. Whereas Apple Maps seems to do the opposite in this case. If I’d have to choose between seeing ads by default or the content that I actually need right now, I would pick the latter. You different?
    - aldarisbm 3y ago
      I guess, I am, very much so. I've never picked up my phone to look at where my gate is, there are usually very big signs showing which way it is. I travel for work. - UX focuses on having a deep understanding of users, what they need. I would wager that more people look at their phone to find food, than to find their gate.
      - voussoir 3y ago
        > I travel for work. That seems important, since most people don't travel for work and only fly once per year or less. They might appreciate the extra confirmation they're going the right way. I'd rather have the Apple map in this case. But of course, I'll stick to OSM!
      - 3y ago

a11r 3y ago

For people with mobility challenges, or those with communication challenges, being able to look at a map of the airport and plan in advance is useful.

aldarisbm 3y ago
https://imgur.com/a/XpdiWer https://imgur.com/a/XpdiWer If i know which gate I'm going to, this is what I would do. Google for my gate
- s3p 3y ago
  To each their own then?

moolcool 3y ago

It is extremely handy to have a map of airport gates. Airports can be very big, and a gate you're transferring to can be a ~20 minute walk away from your arrival gate. Signage usually is sufficient to get you where you want to go, but seldom tells you how long it will take to get there.

aldarisbm 3y ago
I agree, but I think software (although with accessibility in mind, and on the forefront) should be designed for the majority of users with toggles for different use-cases eg a11y. I dont remember the last time I had to check how far away my gates were unless in another terminal, and when that case arises there are ways to look at distance, by being explicit on google maps. Most of the time I'm looking for the starbucks or bathroom or where I can grab a bite. -- I travel for work

pretext-1 3y ago

In big airports, such as FRA, it can take 50 minutes to walk to the gate (if you’re lucky enough to have your gate in terminal 1). Checking the map is useful to see the estimated walking time and to get an overview of the route if you’re not already familiar with the airport. However seeing the locations of the nearest fast food restaurants on the map is superfluous: they’re everywhere. My gate however is only in one location.

aldarisbm 3y ago
I guess my point is that you can _still_ do that. It's not this OR that, it can be this and that. You can still put your gate in google and it will give you walking directions.
- pretext-1 3y ago
  I think OP’s point was that Google Maps prioritizes profitable POIs over useful POIs. Profit over UX. Whereas Apple Maps seems to do the opposite in this case. If I’d have to choose between seeing ads by default or the content that I actually need right now, I would pick the latter. You different?
  - aldarisbm 3y ago
    I guess, I am, very much so. I've never picked up my phone to look at where my gate is, there are usually very big signs showing which way it is. I travel for work. - UX focuses on having a deep understanding of users, what they need. I would wager that more people look at their phone to find food, than to find their gate.
    - voussoir 3y ago
      > I travel for work. That seems important, since most people don't travel for work and only fly once per year or less. They might appreciate the extra confirmation they're going the right way. I'd rather have the Apple map in this case. But of course, I'll stick to OSM!
    - 3y ago